https://ar.wiki-staging.holyquran.wiki/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=%D0%9E%D0%B1%D1%81%D1%83%D0%B6%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5%3A%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%86 2026-10-17T16:21:53Z История изменений этой страницы в вики MediaWiki 1.43.8 https://ar.wiki-staging.holyquran.wiki/index.php?title=%D0%9E%D0%B1%D1%81%D1%83%D0%B6%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5:%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%86&diff=52537&oldid=prev 2022-09-19T19:32:29Z

<p></p> <a href="https://ar.wiki-staging.holyquran.wiki/index.php?title=%D0%9E%D0%B1%D1%81%D1%83%D0%B6%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5:%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%86&amp;diff=52537&amp;oldid=52536">Внесённые изменения</a>

Maqivi https://ar.wiki-staging.holyquran.wiki/index.php?title=%D0%9E%D0%B1%D1%81%D1%83%D0%B6%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5:%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%86&diff=52536&oldid=prev 2022-09-19T15:11:25Z

<p></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="ru"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Предыдущая версия</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Версия от 15:11, 19 сентября 2022</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l30">Строка 30:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Строка 30:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Abābīl, is a Qurʾānic word meaning ‘flocks’ or ‘herds’ (e.g. of birds, horses, camels etc.). This is a rare word in the Arabic language and is only mentioned once in the Qurʾān, in the Sūrat al-Fīl (‘The Elephant’, 105:3): wa arsala ʿalayhim ṭayran abābīl, ‘And He sent against them flights of birds’, and for this reason considerable discussion of the term is found in Qurʾānic commentaries and lexicons. The word seems to have appeared in some verses by the pre-Islamic Arab poets. Imruʾ al-Qays was the first poet to use it, doing so in the phrase abābīlu ṭayrin. Al-Aʿshā, another famous Arab poet, employs it in the phrase abābīlun min al-ṭayri (al-Ṭabrisī, 10/542; Abū al-Futūḥ al-Rāzī, 5/587). The third example appears in a poem attributed to Umayya b. Abī al-Ṣalt (Jeffery, 44); it contains the phrase ḥawla shayṭānihim abābīlun ribbiyyūna in its first verse. However, the verse of Imruʾ al-Qays cannot be found in any version of his collected poems. Umayya&#039;s poem does not appear either in Cheikho&#039;s publications or in the original sources (1/219–237, 177). Al-Aʿshā&#039;s poem, however, is widely known (Cheikho, 177) and this may be the sole evidence indicating that the word was also well known in pre-Islamic times.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Abābīl, is a Qurʾānic word meaning ‘flocks’ or ‘herds’ (e.g. of birds, horses, camels etc.). This is a rare word in the Arabic language and is only mentioned once in the Qurʾān, in the Sūrat al-Fīl (‘The Elephant’, 105:3): wa arsala ʿalayhim ṭayran abābīl, ‘And He sent against them flights of birds’, and for this reason considerable discussion of the term is found in Qurʾānic commentaries and lexicons. The word seems to have appeared in some verses by the pre-Islamic Arab poets. Imruʾ al-Qays was the first poet to use it, doing so in the phrase abābīlu ṭayrin. Al-Aʿshā, another famous Arab poet, employs it in the phrase abābīlun min al-ṭayri (al-Ṭabrisī, 10/542; Abū al-Futūḥ al-Rāzī, 5/587). The third example appears in a poem attributed to Umayya b. Abī al-Ṣalt (Jeffery, 44); it contains the phrase ḥawla shayṭānihim abābīlun ribbiyyūna in its first verse. However, the verse of Imruʾ al-Qays cannot be found in any version of his collected poems. Umayya&#039;s poem does not appear either in Cheikho&#039;s publications or in the original sources (1/219–237, 177). Al-Aʿshā&#039;s poem, however, is widely known (Cheikho, 177) and this may be the sole evidence indicating that the word was also well known in pre-Islamic times.</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></del></div></td><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-added"></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Etymology. As this word is hardly found outside the Qurʾānic context, many scholars have resorted to comparative philology, and at times have proposed somewhat strange linguistic constructions for its derivation. Of the opinions expressed in the old texts, the idea that abābīl is a plural that has no singular form is the one that appears to be the most convincing. Those giving this explanation have done so with reference to Abū ʿUbayda (d. 211/826) and al-Farrāʾ (d. 207/822) (Ibn Hishām, 1/36; al-Ṭabarī, Jāmiʿ al-bayān, 30/191; al-Thaʿālibī, 145; al-Zamakhsharī, 4/799; al-Ṭabrisī, 10/539; Fakhr al-Rāzī, 32/100; Abū al-Futūḥ al-Rāzī, 5/587; al-Ālūsī 30/ 236). Al-Suyūṭī (2/198), however, attributes the use of the singular form, ibbīl, to Abū ʿUbayda. This means that the word abābīl has perhaps been borrowed from a foreign language and so, owing to its similarity with one of the broken plural forms for Arabic nouns, linguists have tried to unearth its singular form. It is also held by some scholars that this was originally an Arabic word belonging to a dialect in which its singular form was rarely employed and thus was eventually forgotten.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Etymology. As this word is hardly found outside the Qurʾānic context, many scholars have resorted to comparative philology, and at times have proposed somewhat strange linguistic constructions for its derivation. Of the opinions expressed in the old texts, the idea that abābīl is a plural that has no singular form is the one that appears to be the most convincing. Those giving this explanation have done so with reference to Abū ʿUbayda (d. 211/826) and al-Farrāʾ (d. 207/822) (Ibn Hishām, 1/36; al-Ṭabarī, Jāmiʿ al-bayān, 30/191; al-Thaʿālibī, 145; al-Zamakhsharī, 4/799; al-Ṭabrisī, 10/539; Fakhr al-Rāzī, 32/100; Abū al-Futūḥ al-Rāzī, 5/587; al-Ālūsī 30/ 236). Al-Suyūṭī (2/198), however, attributes the use of the singular form, ibbīl, to Abū ʿUbayda. This means that the word abābīl has perhaps been borrowed from a foreign language and so, owing to its similarity with one of the broken plural forms for Arabic nouns, linguists have tried to unearth its singular form. It is also held by some scholars that this was originally an Arabic word belonging to a dialect in which its singular form was rarely employed and thus was eventually forgotten.</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l43">Строка 43:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Строка 42:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>It is clear that contemporary scholars have all been trying to find a foreign origin for this word. However, until the 11th/17th century, Muslim scholars did not entertain such opinions and al-Khafājī was possibly the first person to regard ibāla, ibbāla and ībāla as foreign words without, contrary to his usual habit, presenting a proper explanation or mentioning any sources.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>It is clear that contemporary scholars have all been trying to find a foreign origin for this word. However, until the 11th/17th century, Muslim scholars did not entertain such opinions and al-Khafājī was possibly the first person to regard ibāla, ibbāla and ībāla as foreign words without, contrary to his usual habit, presenting a proper explanation or mentioning any sources.</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></del></div></td><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-added"></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>These inconsistencies in the studies in this field have also given rise recently to other possibilities. The form of the word on the one hand and ʿIkrima&#039;s explanation of smallpox on the other, have caused some to refer to the Persian word ablak (ablaq meaning ‘black with swathes of white’ or ‘piebald’, see above, Muqaddam, 438–439), for it was thought that ablak is the same as ābila, and that ibāla and other related forms are derivations of ablak. However, these two words are apparently not connected because ābila is an archaic word mentioned repeatedly in Persian texts, which means blisters or smallpox and takes the form ābilag in Pahlawī. Therefore the word ablak—if any signs of it are to be found in ancient Persian languages—should be compared to the well-known pre-Islamic word ablaq.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>These inconsistencies in the studies in this field have also given rise recently to other possibilities. The form of the word on the one hand and ʿIkrima&#039;s explanation of smallpox on the other, have caused some to refer to the Persian word ablak (ablaq meaning ‘black with swathes of white’ or ‘piebald’, see above, Muqaddam, 438–439), for it was thought that ablak is the same as ābila, and that ibāla and other related forms are derivations of ablak. However, these two words are apparently not connected because ābila is an archaic word mentioned repeatedly in Persian texts, which means blisters or smallpox and takes the form ābilag in Pahlawī. Therefore the word ablak—if any signs of it are to be found in ancient Persian languages—should be compared to the well-known pre-Islamic word ablaq.</div></td></tr> </table>

Maqivi https://ar.wiki-staging.holyquran.wiki/index.php?title=%D0%9E%D0%B1%D1%81%D1%83%D0%B6%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5:%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%86&diff=52535&oldid=prev 2017-09-20T14:43:12Z

<p>Новая страница: «== Вероятней всего == Фраза &quot;Вероятней всего, это слово встречалось в некоторых стихах дои…»</p> <a href="https://ar.wiki-staging.holyquran.wiki/index.php?title=%D0%9E%D0%B1%D1%81%D1%83%D0%B6%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5:%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%86&amp;diff=52535">Внесённые изменения</a>

Maqivi